kimbo.....which fight sucked worse

Kimbo vs dada 5000 was indeed a shit show lol by far one of the worst fights in history of mma.

That being said i'd like to bring up the fact that kimbo put on a horrible fight on the UFC against houston Alexander.After looking over the stats id like to ask which fight do you think was worse???


Heres some statistics from fight metric....

Round 1

Knockdowns/ neither guy scored a knockdown.

Significant strikes landed/kimbo landed 3 of 17 and houston landed
12 of 25....thats 18% & 48%

Total strikes landed/4-17 and 12-25

There was no tds or groundwork of any kind.


Round 2
Knockdowns/none for either guy

Significant strikes/13-21 and 11-12
Thats 62% and 92%

Total strikes landed/19 of 21 and 12 of 20

Kimbo had 3 takedowns,1 sub attemot and 4 passes.


Round 3

Knockdowns/neither guy had one

Significant strikes/11-28 and 20-42
thats 39% and 48%

Total strikes landed/13of28 and 29of 42

Kimbo got 1 takedown and passed once

I know bellator fight was shitty but so was this one.....zombies seem to forget kimbo and houston circling endlessly hesitant to exchange for 15 mins.

Dada and kimbo atleast attacked and it ended in a finish albeit mostly from exhaustion haha.

Kimbo/Houston was worse.  

I think Shamrock/Severn II was worst fight in history that I can remember. They literally did not fight.

CDF47 wrote:Kimbo/Houston was worse.  

I think Shamrock/Severn II was worst fight in history that I can remember.  They literally did not fight.

Completely agree with both statements.

The hypocrisy of the zombies never ends. When Bellator has a bad fight they say they are never watching Bellator again, Bellator sucks, etc. When the ufc has an even worse fight they will say the fight sucks but won't bash the ufc for it, just the fight itself. They are no different than cult members.

Very true i brought this up on other site of course no one has a comment other then im a bellator fanboy haha.

No one can give me real feedback just relentless repeating of the same bs.

Just funny how blind they can be to reality.

Kimbo vs. Dada5000 was best fight ever and I want to see Kimbo vs. Rogers (or Zulu) next

Kinosis wrote:

CDF47 wrote:Kimbo/Houston was worse.  

I think Shamrock/Severn II was worst fight in history that I can remember.  They literally did not fight.

Completely agree with both statements.  

The hypocrisy of the zombies never ends.  When Bellator has a bad fight they say they are never watching Bellator again, Bellator sucks, etc.  When the ufc has an even worse fight they will say the fight sucks but won't bash the ufc for it, just the fight itself.  They are no different than cult members.  

True, some real good points.

fka wrote:Very true i brought this up on other site of course no one has a comment other then im a bellator fanboy haha.

No one can give me real feedback just relentless repeating of the same bs.

Just funny how blind they can be to reality.

That's their MO. They can't argue because many of their points are baseless so they just result to ridicule. It's the same tactic over and over and over and over again.

Rizin=PRIDEFC wrote:Kimbo vs. Dada5000 was best fight ever and I want to see Kimbo vs. Rogers (or Zulu) next  

LOL...I did actually enjoy the fight because I never seen anything quite like it. Dada literally fought to the point where he physically could not even stand anymore. That takes some serious heart.

Seriously laugh if u want but he fought with everuthing he had.

CDF47 wrote:Kimbo/Houston was worse.  

I think Shamrock/Severn II was worst fight in history that I can remember.  They literally did not fight.

this